Going for the Gold †Theology Essay

Going for the Gold – Theology Essay Free Online Research Papers Going for the Gold Theology Essay The Hamm twins have come a long way from swinging from the rafters in their Waukesha, WI barn to going for a gold medal at the 2004 Summer Olympic Games in Athens, Greece. Paul Hamm became the first American in Olympic history to win the Men’s All-Around Gymnastics gold medal. I must confess that I thought that his medal hopes were surely over when he took a tragic fall on his vault landing. But Paul Hamm went on to perform two of the most spectacular and flawless routines of his career to win an Olympic gold medal by the closest margin in Olympic history. It’s astounding to hear the numerous stories of adversity that these Olympians have had to overcome just to compete in the games. Such as 16 year-old Dana Vollmer who underwent heart surgery and has to have a defibulator at every meet she competes in. She swam on the women’s 800-meter freestyle relay team that broke the oldest record in swimming and won the gold. What propels these men and women to become Olympic champions? When the Apostle Paul wrote about the race of life that we must all run, he referred to the Olympic athletes. â€Å"Remember that in a race everyone runs, but only one gets the prize. You must also run in such a way that you will win . . . They do it to win a prize that will fade away, but we do it for an eternal prize† (I Corinthians 9:24-27 NLT). How can we become champions who go for the gold and win the prize of eternal life and wear the victor’s crown when we stand before God someday? Consider the eight principles that will propel you to victory in the race of life. First – You must LEGALLY QUALIFY and LAWFULLY RUN. Not just any athlete can compete in the games. They must first qualify in the trials. To be in the Christian race you must first qualify. There is only one way to qualify in this race. Jesus said, â€Å"You must be born again† (John 3:3). You must have a spiritual birth from above by putting your faith in Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross for your sins. (See John 1:12 and Ephesians 2:8-9.) Many athletes were disqualified because they did not compete according to the rules. Jesus said, â€Å"If you love me keep my commandments.† But there is Good News. If we are disqualified in our race, God is merciful. â€Å"If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness† (I John 1:9-10). Second – LEARN from others. Paul tells us that we are surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses. (See Hebrews 12:1.) They are in the grandstands of heaven cheering us on. Be encouraged by them. Learn from them. (See Hebrews 11.) All Olympic athletes have a coach. Great men and women of the Bible and godly men and women who have gone before us and those around us can teach and inspire us. Third – LENGTHEN your Stride and Staying Power. To go for the gold requires endurance, perseverance, and much patience. Paul gives us key principles for the race of life. â€Å"Let us run with endurance the race God has set before us† (Hebrews 12:1). Don’t give up. Only training and discipline can develop your endurance. (See Hebrews 12:12-13, I Corinthians 9:25, 27, and James 1:14, 12.) Lift up your hands, head, heals, and heart. Fourth – LIGHTEN your LOAD. Champions will lay aside everything that slows them down. â€Å"Let us strip off every weight that slows us down, especially the sin that so easily hinders our progress† (Hebrews 12:1 NLT). Fifth – LOOK to Jesus. Every athlete must keep their eyes on the goal. To take your eyes off the goal is to become disheartened, to loose your way, or to make a misstep that could cost you the race. â€Å"Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith† (Hebrews 12:2-3). Jesus is our all. He is our goal, aim, motivation, inspiration, power, and our prize. Consider what he endured for you. Sixth – LOVE Discipline and Training. A champion learns to love the discipline and training that it takes to make them a winner. They know that without pain there is no gain. Our coach disciplines us for our good. (See Hebrews 12:4-11.) Seventh – LIVE a Clean and Holy life. Athletes know that to be a champion they must take care of their body and attitude. An Olympic champion must have heart and character. Many times a less talented athlete wins over a more gifted competitor simply because they had more heart. What pleases God and makes one a winner in our heavenly judge’s eyes is character of heart – holiness. â€Å"Try to live in peace with everyone and seek to live a clean and holy life for those who are not holy will not see the Lord† (Hebrews 12:14-17 NLT). There is only one way to be holy and clean in heart. Come to Jesus â€Å"the one who mediates the new covenant between God and people and to the sprinkled blood which graciously forgives instead of crying out for vengeance as the blood of Able did† (Hebrews 12:22-24 NLT). Eighth – LONG for the Victor’s Crown. (See Hebrews 12:22-23.) What motivates and propels an Olympian? A gold medal. The ancient Olympians competed for a laurel wreath. It symbolized a champion. Paul said that they did it for a crown that perishes. The glory of this world doesn’t last. Go for the gold that lasts. The prize that doesn’t fade away – eternity in the heavens. God’s rewards and glory are everlasting. When you long for heaven and heaven’s Prize you will have a hope and helper to propel you to victory. Go for the gold! Research Papers on Going for the Gold - Theology EssayMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever ProductTrailblazing by Eric AndersonMoral and Ethical Issues in Hiring New EmployeesBook Review on The Autobiography of Malcolm XComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoHonest Iagos Truth through Deception19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyThe Hockey GameBringing Democracy to Africa

Table of Italian Interjections - Exclamations in Italian

Table of Italian Interjections - Exclamations in Italian You should know this list of common Italian interjections and their meanings. Common Italian Interjections abbasso- down with!ah- ha!ahi- ouch!, ay!ahimà ¨- alas!, woe is me!attenti- attention!basta- enough!, stop!boh- I have no idea!bravo- bravo!, well done! way to go!eh- ehmagari- I wish!, if only!mah- who knows?oh- ohohi- uh ohohibà ²- tut-tut!, tsk tsk!, phew!ohimà ¨- dear mepeccato- what a pity, what a shame, too badsalute- cheerstoh- tohuffa- what a bore!uh- ehmviva- hurrah for†¦!, long live...!zitto- silence! shut up!che spavento!- how scary!alla buonora!- at last! (finally!)buon viaggio!- have a good trip!mamma mia!- dear me!santo cielo!- goodness gracious!evviva!- hurray!salve!- hello!bene!- ok! (all right!)dio ce ne scampi e liberi!- God forbid!sicuro!- sure! (of course!)dai!- come on! (come now!)che fregatura!- what a rip-off!per carit!- for pitys sake! (please!)per amor del cielo!- for heavens sake!via!- go away! (go! come on!)accidenti!- damn it! (my goodness)povero me!- poor me!coraggio!- take heart!che barba!- how boring!

Summarises the themes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Summarises the themes - Essay Example They wrapped both of his legs tips of toes to his hips. Writer further adds that they also wrapped his arms to his shoulders. According to author, this was done to keep the remaining blood to heart and lung. The main theme of this paragraph is that at the time of death, this person is experiencing very strange situation where he is being wrapped by persons near him. Authors say he was too much angry on himself as he was totally powerless then. He means to say that he was not able to move or speak. The conversation of the people around author at the time of death was annoying the author and making the author angrier. The main theme of these lines is that the author is so angry after observing these unusual happenings. The author says that suddenly the scene changed he sees himself in a place other than that room. The place is very peaceful and beautiful. That place was seemed to be timeless and spaceless. The author sees that the colors were changing again and again and the beautiful sounds near him were making him feel like he was floating in the air. The main theme of this scene is that the author has now died and opens his eye into paradise. Then he finds this place very alluring. He observed that time has stopped and that place is different the world. Another main theme of this scene is that the paradise is very beautiful. The author observed loving and caring beings at that place. He says those people were in white clothes and encircling around him. The place was looking blur and like translucent clouds. So the main theme of this scene is that the author has found angels near him and it is a dreamlike situation where things are blur. The writer became happy to see all this beauty and peace around him. Those people said to author that they are his guides and are helpers of GOD. Then the writer observed an immense presence came and bathed him in white light and attractive diamond like

Micro-Finance in Bangladesh Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 12

Micro-Finance in Bangladesh - Essay Example Project governance consists of a number of activities such as those related to corporate decision making and organizational structures. Â  Bangladesh is classified as a Least Developed Country by the United Nations Organization. With a population of roughly 125 million, i.e. more than twice the population of Britain, it’s lacking in almost every conceivable resource for human consumption. The Grameen Bank has initiated a housing loan scheme among others for the poorer segments of Bangladeshis so that they would borrow even if they are unable to show collateral. Those pavement dwellers and squatters on government properties have partially benefited from this scheme. They are the first group of external stakeholders, while those contractors are also considered as external stakeholders of the project. However, employees and managers on sites are regarded as internal stakeholders (Cadle and Yeates, 2007). The government of Bangladesh and the international community such as INGOs, the World Bank, the UNICEF and the IMF are also involved in these projects as providers of auxiliary services such as safe drinking wat er, schools, hospitals and so on. The following stakeholder map illustrates how various stakeholders of a similar project would be brought under a single map for the analysis of links within and without the project. While the physical dimension of the project might be limited to its primary housing project, its real impact would be felt far beyond the far corners of the country itself. Â  While this sheet does not provide a detailed management structure for every stakeholder group involved in the project, it adequately illustrates how each relevant stakeholder group is managed through the project governance process (Carroll, 2006). Stakeholders might have different levels of interest in a project depending on the level of impact on them.

Buddhism - Every Moment We Live is an Opportunity (for understanding) :: Buddhism

Every Moment We Live is an Opportunity (for understanding) Something that interests us all is ourselves - because we are the subject and main focus of our lives. No matter what you think of yourself, there is a natural interest because you have to live with yourself for a lifetime. The self view is therefore something that can give us a lot of misery if we see ourselves in the wrong way. Even under the best of circumstances, if we don't see ourselves in the right way we still end up creating suffering in our minds. The Buddha was trying to point out that the way to solve the problem isn't through trying to make everything right and pleasant on the external dimension, but to develop the right understanding, the right attitude towards ourselves, and to overall just do what we can. Living in the US at this time, we expect comfort and all kinds of privileges and material comforts. This makes life more pleasant in many ways, but when our every need is provided for and life is too comfortable, something in us just doesn't develop. Sometimes it is the struggle through hardship that develops and matures us as human beings. But when we give up or surrender to restriction and to restraint through wisdom, we find liberation. Life is the experience of restriction and restraint, being born in our own skin and having to live under the laws of nature. Mentally we can fly to the sky, but physically we are bound to limitations that get more and more restrictive the older we get. This isn’t seen as suffering by us because that’s just the way things are. The sense of oneself is something that we are aware of when we are children; when we’re born there is no sense of a self as being anything. As we grow up we learn what we are supposed to be, if we are good or bad, if we are pretty or ugly, if we are smart or stupid. So we develop a sense of ourselves. Even when we get older, sometimes we still have very adolescent attitudes or childish emotional reactions to life that we have been unable to resolve except by suppressing or ignoring them. There is one way of talking about the self that makes it sound very doctrinal. It seemed to me that Buddhists can sometimes say that there is no self, as if it was a proclamation that they have to believe in; as if there were some higher being saying "THERE IS NO SELF BOYS AND

Theme of Duplicity in

THEME OF DUPLICITY IN THREE SHORT STORIES OF HENRY JAMES: THE LIAR, THE REAL THING, AND THE BEAST IN THE JUNGLE Nazan Gokay Theme of Duplicity in Three Short Stories of Henry James: â€Å"The Liar,† â€Å"The Real Thing,† and â€Å"The Beast in the Jungle† The genius of Henry James manifests itself in duality of meaning in both his shorter and longer works. Appearance and reality provide for two levels of expression. On one level the theme is explicit as told by the narrator, but underneath lies the ambiguous meaning which is in a sense the main theme of the story. The ambiguity is usually embedded in the narrative; it is the task of the attentive reader to seek it out, understand it and enjoy it. James does not make this task easy for the reader. His style is subtle, vague, and demands a lot of attention. One clue to the real meaning of James’s stories is the irony employed. Most of James’s narrators are unrealiable in the sense that they are deceptive. Their unreliability is either a result of their blindness or unawareness of their situation and environment, or an egotistical engagement in their own affairs so as to distort reality. The unreliable narrator misleads the reader. The Jamesian irony clarifies the story, brings out the real meaning beneath the apparent and reveals the unreliable narrator. â€Å"The Liar† is a perfect example of the use of an unreliable narrator and the existence of two levels of meaning, the real and the apparent. Although the story is not told from a first person point of view, the narrator confines himself only to the mind of Oliver Lyon, a painter and former suitor of Mrs. Capadose. The events are recorded through Lyon’s mind and we perceive people through his eyes. According to Lyon, Colonel Capadose is a villainous liar who has to be exposed. Lyon’s conception of Capadose as a liar and his envy of the Colonel have blinded Lyon to appreciate him as an amiable human being which in fact he is. Lyon treacherously plans to expose the Colonel in a portrait he will paint as â€Å"the liar† and eventually renew his friendship with Mrs. Capadose. Lyon’s account of the event is the apparent and superficial meaning of the story. Colonel Capadose is the liar and he has corrupted his wife through their years of marriage, for at the end of the story she, too, lies in order to save her husband. Lyon, as the disillusioned hero, watches them depart from his life, thinking that â€Å"he had trained her too well. † On a deeper and more significant level, Oliver Lyon is the real liar. Although Colonel has been known as a liar, he is a harmless man who is only engaged in a social game. In society, in human relationships, one has to wear a mask. Lyon himself points out at the dinner party that people like others not because they are strictly honest but because they are skillful in deception. Lyon’s treachery is much more significant than Colonel’s social games. Lyon tries to violate the integrity of another man’s character; moreover, he plans to expose him to the public. Subtle but definitely present Jamesian irony brings out the essence of the story. The most obvious ironical device is the name Oliver Lyon, who is the real liar. The exposure of the couple at the end is ironically at the expense of Lyon who loses forever any chance he might have had with this ideal woman, the woman that he has loved for so long. Through the story Lyon plots against the Colonel, but in fact he is bringing about his own disillusionment. In this manner, the real meaning of â€Å"The Liar† emerges as a result of Lyon’s self-defeat, not from humiliation of Colonel Capadose as Lyon had anticipated. The circumstance of â€Å"The Real Thing† is slightly different than the â€Å"The Liar. † Although the theme of duplicity, dichotomy between the apparent and the real is still the central issue, there is no unreliable narrator. In â€Å"The Liar† the superficial is conveyed through accounts of the unreliable narrator and the real is embedded in the ironical and false character of Oliver Lyon. In â€Å"The Real Thing† the dichotomy between the real and the apparent is explicitly stated. In this story James is concerned with the mission of the artist who seeks for expressive and imaginative realism in potential nothings rather than in concrete, conventional real things. Mr. and Mrs. Monarch, as their names imply, are types or norms of a superior humanity. They are ideal, real, and aristocratic in life, but they are not right for art. When the painter tries to paint them, their portraits materialise as rigid, photograhic images. The painter-narrator discovers that Miss Churm and Oronte who are socially nothings prove to be the real things for art. They can adopt aristocratic poses better than those who are really aristocratic in life. On a social level Mr. and Mrs. Monarch, â€Å"a gentleman and a lady† as the porter’s wife announces them, are the real things. The social institution, their married life is perfect, they are devoted to each other. On an aesthetic level, the artist’s imagination is the real thing. On this level the reality of Monarchs is no longer valid; Miss Churm and Oronte replace them. The irony of the story rests on the fact that for the artist, the represented subject is more essential than the real thing. The Beast in the Jungle† is the story of a man who is haunted by fear and expectation simultaneously that something will happen to him. John Marcher is the typical blind hero of James. His self-indulgence prevents him from seeing the reality, thus his view, through which the story is narrated, is unreliable. John Marcher is similar to Oliver Lyon in that his self-deception resul ts in inflicting pain to others, although his motives are not aggressive like Lyon’s. Marcher is not a villain as Lyon is. He causes May’s and his own unhappiness unwittingly. His flaw is his blindness, but certainly not treachery. His situation is as ironic as Lyon’s in that he tries to be ordinary and hide his uniquenesss, while he is unaware that his uniqueness is that he is, in fact, ordinary. The double meaning is conveyed through the two characters of the story. John Marcher manifests the superficial and apparent aspect, while May Bartram presents the real and underlying theme. Most of the story is related through John Marcher’s point of view as the â€Å"The Liar† was told through Lyon’s point of view. The underlying theme is expressed in the dialogues with May Bartram, who is a very perceptive and intelligent woman. Soon after she has made his acquaintance, she sees his real issue. She comes to love him, but he is too engrossed in his expectations to notice her unquestioned presence and friendship. As years go by she sees â€Å"it† not happening. Finally, before she dies she tells him that â€Å"It has come†, but he is still unaware. His moment of recognition comes when he visits her grave and realizes that he has lost her forever, and that he is â€Å"the man, to whom nothing on earth was to have happened. As in the other two stories, the names of the characters are significant in stressing the theme of duplicity. Marcher is winter; May is spring. Marcher is fear; May is love. Marcher advances in a stately manner, but never reaches May in her lifetime. In â€Å"The Liar† and â€Å"The Beast in the Jungle† unreliable narrators are used to convey and st ress the double meaning. In â€Å"The Real Thing† the dichotomy between the real and the apparent is presented as a problem confronting the artist. In either case the theme of duplicity is employed to add richness and depth to the meaning of the stories. The double meaning, irony, and unreliable narrators have become indispensable elements of Jamesian fiction. BIBLIOGRAPHY Matthiessen, F. O. Henry James: The Major Phase. New York: Oxford University Press, 1963. Powers, Lyall H. Henry James: An Introduction and Interpretation. New York: Holt , Rinehart and Winston, Inc. , 1970. Stone, Edward, ed. Henry James: Seven Stories and Studies. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc. , 1961. Tompkins, Jane P. , ed. Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Turn of the Screw and Other Tales. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. , 1970.

Shirley Chisholm, First Black Woman in Congress

Shirley Chisholm  (born Shirley Anita St. Hill, November 30, 1924–January 1, 2005) was the first African-American woman ever elected to the U.S. Congress. She represented the 12th Congressional District of New York for seven terms (1968–1982) and quickly became known for her work on minority, womens, and peace issues. Fast Facts: Shirley Chisholm Known For: First African-American woman to serve in the U.S. Congress, from 1968–1982Born: November 30, 1924 in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, New YorkParents: Charles and Ruby Seale St. HillEducation: Brooklyn College (B.A., sociology, cum laude); Columbia University (M.A., elementary education)Died: January 1, 2005 in Ormond Beach, FloridaPublished Works: Unbought and Unbossed and The Good FightSpouse(s): Conrad O. Chisholm (1959–1977), Arthur Hardwicke, Jr. (1977–1986)Notable Quote: That I am a national figure because I was the first person in 192 years to be at once a congressman, black and a woman proves, I think, that our society is not yet either just or free. Early Life Shirley Chisholm was born in the Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York on November 30, 1924. She was the eldest of four daughters of her immigrant parents, Charles St. Hill, a factory worker from British Guiana, and Ruby Seale St. Hill, a seamstress from Barbados. In 1928, because of financial hardship, Shirley and two of her sisters were sent to Barbados to be raised by her grandmother, where they were educated in the islands British-style school system. They returned to New York in 1934, even though the financial situation had not been resolved. Shirley attended Brooklyn College for a degree in sociology, where she won prizes in debating but found she was barred from the social club, as all blacks were, so she organized a rival club. She graduated with honors in 1946 and found work at two daycare centers in New York. She became an authority on early education and child welfare, and an educational consultant for Brooklyns Bureau of Child Welfare. At the same time, she worked as a volunteer with the local political leagues and the League of Women Voters. Deeper Involvement in Politics In 1949, Shirley married Conrad O. Chisholm, a private investigator and graduate student from Jamaica. Together they became increasingly involved in New York municipal political issues, establishing a number of local organizations to bring blacks and Hispanics into politics. Shirley Chisholm returned to school and obtained a masters degree in elementary education from Columbia University in 1956 and became involved in grassroots community organizing and the Democratic Party, helping form the Unity Democratic Club in 1960. Her community base helped make possible a win when she ran for the New York State Assembly in 1964. Congress In 1968, Shirley Chisholm ran for Congress from Brooklyn, winning that seat while running against James Farmer, an African-American veteran of the 1960s Freedom Rides in the south and the former national chairman of the Congress of Racial Equality. With her win, she became the first black woman elected to Congress. Her first congressional battle—she fought many—was with the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Wilbur Mills, who was responsible for assigning committee appointments. Chisholm was from the urban 12th district in New York; Mills assigned her to the agricultural committee. Apparently, she said, all they know here in Washington about Brooklyn is that a tree grew there.  The speaker of the House told her to be a good soldier and accept the assignment, but she persisted and eventually Mills assigned her to the Education and Labor Committees. She hired only women for her staff and was known for taking positions against the Vietnam War, for minority and womens issues, and for challenging the Congressional seniority system. She was outspoken and uninterested in conforming: in 1971, Chisholm was a founding member of the National Womens Political Caucus and in 1972, she visited the voluble segregationist Alabama governor George Wallace in the hospital when he was recovering from an assassination attempt. He was astonished to see her and she was criticized for visiting him, but the act opened doors. In 1974, Wallace provided his support for her bill to extend federal minimum wage provisions to domestic workers. Running for President and Leaving Congress Chisholm ran for the Democratic nomination for president in 1972. She knew she could not win the nomination, which eventually went to George McGovern, but she nevertheless wanted to raise issues she felt were important. She was the first black person and the first black woman to run for president on a major party ticket and was the first woman to win delegates for a presidential nomination by a major party. In 1977, she divorced her first husband and married businessman Arthur Hardwicke, Jr. Chisholm served in Congress for seven terms. She retired in 1982 because, as she put it, moderate and liberal lawmakers were running for cover from the new right. She also wanted to take care of her husband, who had been injured in an automobile accident; he died in 1986. In 1984, she helped form the National Political Congress of Black Women (NPCBW). From 1983 to 1987, she taught politics and womens studies as the Purington Professor at Mount Holyoke College and spoke widely. She moved to Florida in 1991 and briefly served as the ambassador to Jamaica during President Bill Clintons first term. Death and Legacy Shirley Chisholm died at her home in Ormond Beach, Florida on January 1, 2005, after suffering a series of strokes. Chisholms legacy of grit and persistence is apparent in all of her writings, speeches, and actions in and out of government. She was involved in the founding or administration or strong support of numerous organizations, including the National Organization of Women, the League of Women Voters, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), and the National Womens Political Caucus. She said in 2004, I want history to remember me not just as the first black woman to be elected to Congress, not as the first black woman to have made a bid for the presidency of the United States, but as a black woman who lived in the 20th century and dared to be herself. Sources Barron, James. Shirley Chisholm, Unbossed pioneer in Congress, Is Dead at 80. The New York Times, 3 January 2005.Chisholm, Shirley. The Good Fight. New York: Harper Row, 1973. Print.Unbought and Unbossed. Washington, DC: Take Root Media, 1970 (2009).Jackson, Harold. Shirley Chisholm: The First Black Woman Elected to Congress, She Was an Outspoken Advocate against Discrimination. The Guardian, 3 January 2005.Thurber, Jon. Shirley Chisholm, 80; Ran for President, Served 13 Years in Congress. Los Angeles Times, 4 January 2005.