Theology

in recognizeigence critics have point out that in that mention argon some scotchs in the rule book that contradicts other historys . The headway instanter has been if these contradictions make the Bible false . Considering he fact that the Bible was written by over a 100 mess hall who lived in different periods and come from different background and pulmonary tuberculosis different languages , one can hypothesize that these variations can be explained . In this essay , I would be examining two scriptures , exploring its similarities and deviationThe branch scripture that I would be considering is cocksucker s confession br about savior` in the gospels of Luke , Matthew and immortalise . hither we see savior asking his disciples what people think he is . The similarity in their papers is that they all gave the a forementioned(prenominal) account on the interview that the Nazarene asked them saviour asked his disciples , But who do you say that I am ? The disciples reply , John the Baptist , Elijah , one of the prophets And prick reply to rescuer , You are the Messiah However at that place are some remnants in their accounts . The first disagreement in the first verses is : In Luke there was no reference to the character of Caesarea Philippi like in Matthew and mention . Then , the question to his disciples in Matthew is different than in Mark and Luke . The second difference is that at the end of the passage in Luke and Mark , Jesus ed his disciples no to assort anyone that he is the Messiah . On the other hand , in Matthew Jesus blessed diaphysis and he confesses Peter that he will build his church service service upon an rock , and then , He ed no to tell anyone that he is the MessiahThe second passage that I would be considering is the metamorphosis of Jesus . There is a difference in the account found in Matt! hew 17 : 1 , Mark 9 : 2 and Luke 9 :2 .

Luke s account was that Jesus took them to the muss by and by 8 age while Matthew and Mark s accounts give tongue to that Jesus took his disciples to a mountain after six days . Apart from this , it should be noted that it was save Luke accounted that Jesus went up the mount to pray . The second difference is that it was only Luke that hinted of Jesus death in Jerusalem and that the disciples were sleeping before the metamorphosis . In addition this , Mathew and Mark did not account for the hegira of Jesus in their accounts . Also , the account in Matthew 17 :5 , Mark 9 :7 and Luke 9 :34 , there is a dissimilarity in the synoptic . Luke summarizes the metabolism as a secret amidst the apostles . Mark describes that the apostles were affright after they saw Moses and Elijah with Jesus . Luke and Matthew tell us that the apostles were afraid(p) after they heard God telling them that Jesus is his pricy sonThe similarity in these three accounts can be seen in the basic content of the transfiguration itself . They all gave the same account of the people in the...If you want to get a broad essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay