Revision Only: Individual Contribution Statement

Individual Contribution StatementOur project began with brainstorming sessions on how to strike the task at hold . On this basic vex , we were discussing about so many ideas that I tangle it was perspicacity of conviction that we pul lead those ideas together and start call oning on the intro . I forwarded to the conclave through our free radical attracter , Katherine that we had already do enough brainstorming for the mean meter and now had to fool a plan of attack . To this eat up , I shared which ideas that my group duo contributed was accept suitable for me , oddly Shawn s and David s . I entangle that it was chief(prenominal) at that point for me to play a trick on expressed the engage to get the ball rolling beca put down if we spent to much time gaugeing about what to do , we might not take hold had enough time to properly and thoroughly research on our respective subs . Everyone leased to know what their jobs were going to be so they could have full time to prepare for it . My parting was an endeavor to begin a synergy of the ideas presented by my group mates to form an echt action plan which was successful . My group agreed with what I was saying and we began to make concrete progressWe began to knead on our identify research subs . Towards this objective , I chose to clobber on Barriers in chat . I similarlyk interest on the subject after reservation a brief online interpret on the table of contents of some of the possible subs . I felt that this was ingrained to our primary(prenominal) which was on Business chats . I began my work first by internalizing the s importance . I valued to focus on the crucial points that hindered impelling oral converse theory and how to subdue those parapets . This cultivateion led meto the CGAP website where I was a ble to grow a word on several barriers to ! oral confabulation . This included ill-timed vocabulary misuse of jargons , and ambiguity . I was as well able to obtain insights on other barriers such(prenominal) as accent , status , and manner of speaking . I was able to explain distributively of these barriers to my group and we were able to structured them as a considerable part of the presentation . I think that these contributions were quite profound since they present the common pitfalls of dialogue which we want to bend . My contribution to the presentation was able to defend that since people don t ever speak the same verbiage , misunderstandings tin often overhaul . It supported the idea that divers(prenominal) expressions and technical words may suit signifi laughingstockt disarray in vocal conferences . I presented examples in the unite States where more than half of the population speaks side of meat barely as a second row . I concretized this argument with examples in business and in educa tion . These were great contributions as they added mettle to the presentation and made it a bulk more comprehensiveI force from Barry s 1980 book that effective converse can only occur when communication is free from any verbiage barriers . I researched on the possible ways to overcome the barriers which led me to Levy s 2003 online condition on effective verbal communication . This source provided widely distributed ideas on how to break the language barrier These ideas included the use of correct vocabulary , avoidance of too much flowery words , and being an active listener . I choose out the in formation from aim to give the prescribed and negative effects of verbal communication , and then I was able to formulate some Do s andDon ts in verbal communication . This original contribution was essential to our presentation s solutions to the barriers of verbal communication I contributed that an effective verbalizer system has to use script movements , adapt materi al and manner to the soulfulness speaking with mold! thoughts before expressing sense the mood of the soul or group , observe audience body language , and modulate smack of voice . On the other hand speaker should avoid rambling , use of jargon unacquainted with(predicate) to the audience cheering , and speaking simultaneously with another speaker . My contributions were part of many bulleted lists that strengthened our presentation and I felt that they were an important circumstance in the excellent evaluation of our workI think effective communication is essential to how a manager creates and develops effective organizational teams . In the dynamics of our group , I believe that effective communication played very well in getting our idiosyncratic ideas across and synergizing them into actual action plans . I think that in the same way , effective organizational teams need to have open and unprejudiced lines of communication . The team leaders must be aware of the individual differences of his members and should do his best to bridge circuit language gaps and break language barriers . The team members should besides be provided an atmosphere in which they can freely share their ideas so that the best of those ideas can be culled effectively from the group and dumbfound into action . Finally , I think that effective managers need to be effective speakers also because they interact not only with team members but also with outside forces that concern the work of the group . Thus , it is important that they follow the guidelines set by the report in making effective use of verbal communicationReferencesGuerrero , L .K . The Nonverbal Communication Reader : Classic and contemporaneous Readings . London : Waveland Press , 1999Barry , R .E . Business English for the 80 s (2nd ed . New tee shirt Prentice Hall , 1980Levy , S . Effective Verbal Communication . February , 2003 . Sussex website April 11 , 2007 http / web .sussex .ac .uk /srac /effective_verbal_communication .htmBarriers to Verbal Communicatio n . CGAP website . April 11 , 2007HYPERLINK http /cga! p .org http /cgap .org / channel /docs tot /tot5_b .doc ...If you want to get a full essay, club it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay