Sartre`s View Of Freedom

Sartre s View of Personal Freedom2006Jean-Paul Sartre was the French existentialist philosopher , writer dramatist and essayist . One ofthe main points of his philosophy is the concept of franchise . He considered that s cable carcely somebody determines his future by wangle decisions , therefore he is condemned to be free . I correspond with Sartre that the person is completely responsible for all his choices however , in my opinion , absolute emancipation undersurface exist tho in theory whereas in real life the individual limits his or her license , in to correspond to some simple , public etc . rules , because the benignant universe depends on temper and the societyTo swag with , Sartre didn t take into the account the fact that an individual has to depend on genius , which limits his independence . On the one hand , the pityingity creation has conquered nature . For example , he has changed the channel of the river , sunk mountains and even so made nuclear energy to work for his realise . and then , there emerges the impression that he is free to do what he wants and nothing in this world shadower moderate him notwithstanding , it is a matter of common knowledge that human activities in the recent years have so greatly pollute nature that we are facing the problem of planetary change . This is a serious hazard nowadays and m whatsoever an(prenominal) scientists deal with this problem . We rear end t live contrary to laws of nature and have to be responsible for our activities . thence , we depend on nature , although we have already conquered it . Thus , I partially agree with Sartre , because we are completely responsible for our activities , simply our independence is limited , as we depend on nature and can t do whatever we likeIn my opinion , exemption of the indi vidual depends on many factors specifically ! on the society , in which he or she lives . This standpoint can be demonstrated on Sartre s own example that illustrates his understanding(a) of freedom .

The individual who is standing at a cliff and has a right to move off or not . Nobody and nothing can go on him from the fatal step , and it is here that the freedom of the human being becomes apparent . However , on mature verbal recipe , many considerations make the individual stick to life and not to death , for instance , the sufferings of relatives , the lot of orphaned children and so on Moreover , if the individual dies , the responsibility for his or her death go away be born by their relatives or boney friends . Therefore , the individual thinks that he or she has absolute freedom , but in fact , it is an illusion , because he or she depends on their close people and the society on the building block . This shows that incomplete freedom , nor responsibility can be absoluteFurthermore , ad hominem freedom can t be absolute , because one ad hominem freedom ends where another personal freedom starts . For instance , when move in the car , the individual is the complete owner of the car , so he or she can race on any road on any speed...If you want to bum around a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper